On Tuesday 25 February 2003 5:32 pm, Miguel wrote:
> Actually, I think I would rather help finish it up and ship this version.
>
> I just pulled down the cvs tip. I will take a look at it.
>
> As I recall, the main problem we have is with atom configurations. What
> are the other outstanding issues?
Ok, have a look at what i've done to jmol.xml in CDK... the src/jmol.classes
is now actually generated from src/jmol.javafiles, in order to have exactly
those classes in the jar, that we define to be compiled... (i remember you
requesting that...)
What I still need to do is:
1. have the jmol.xml have targets for building an applet jmolcdk.jar and an
application jmolcdk.jar... e.g. if the applet cdk.jar is build, a patch
should be applied that removes the check wether something is a file,
when loading the atom type configuration, which *is* needed in the
application
2. move the cdk/libio/jmol/Convertor.java to Jmol's CVS, so that CDK less
depends on jmol.jar to get compiled
3. update the new Convertor.java to match the current Jmol data classes
4. Use the new Convertor.java to read ShelX
That's all I can think of now, except for more applet testing...
I'll be heading home now... cu tommorow!
Egon
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
