On Sunday 02 January 2005 18:02, Miguel wrote: > > So where do we go from here? > > I am not comfortable introducing a large number of very specific methods > into the core of the Viewer.
I was wondering about the get() methods anyway... should those be part of a Viewer... Miguel once told me that Jmol should only be a visualisation tool... and that does not require get methods... Should it not be such that the get stuff is in the class that wraps around (or uses) the viewer? Egon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
