Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I found some issues in the documentation. JmolDevelopersGuide.docbok.xml > > does not contain valid xml[1]. I fixed this. > > Do you mean the reference to the dtd ?
No. The source wasn't valid. E.g. <listitem>text</listitem> does not follow the DTD and is invalid. Or sections without a title tag. These two things were the main errors I fixed. > You have replaced "../../build/docbook-xml/docbookx.dtd" by > "http://docbook.org/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd";. > Is it necessary ? I need it to validate the xml. Because, if xmllint can't find the DTD, it cannot validate it, so I always use the dtd in the www (for all my docbook files). I'm sorry, normally I changed it back to "../../build/docbook-xml/docbookx.dtd". It seems I forgot it. I will fix it soon. > Egon (I think) and I decided to make this change the other way a few weeks > ago so that updating docbook-xml-x.y.zip in the doc folder won't need to > modify each xml file. That's an interesting point, I wanted to ask you. Why do you need the docbook-xml files/archive with the DTDs inside the source? What is the advantage to having the DTDs inside the source? Regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
