On 2005-05-03 (20:24) Bob Hanson wrote: >I think the other convention is the "x-convention" ZXZ. >Is it safe to say that "show orientation" is going to continue >to elicit curiosity because of the unfamiliarity of Euler angles? >If so, perhaps a comment would help. Maybe: > > >>show orientation > >moveTo 1 -574 772 273 91.2; >OR >reset; rotate z -21.1; rotate y 86.9;; rotate z 52.2; >#No, damn it! It's not supposed to be "rotate x". THIS IS NOT A BUG. >
as much as I enjoy this one ;-) I don't think it is necessary. perhaps a comment in the code... I asked mainly because one might want to parse the commands out of a show orientation callback, and I saw the bug report unattended - which I will now remedy. :-) bye, tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:raleigh "Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one." - Malcolm S. Forbes ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
