On 2005-05-27 (23:26) Miguel wrote:

>> any chance we can apply color *schemes* to translucent objects, too?
>>
>> color bonds translucent cpk
>
>I'm glad that you asked
>
>Your proposal works for *most* things. The schemes can now be applied
>quite independently to the different types of objects. And the
>translucent/opaque can be used anyplace.
>
oh, very very nice!


>However, I wasn't sure what to do with bonds. The current model is that
>bonds can only have one color. When they are inheriting the atom colors
>they get drawn as two colors because their *one* color is _none_.
>
>So, I didn't really know what to do with 'color bonds cpk' or 'color
>bonds amino' because the bonds are split into two different colors.
>
>I am somewhat afraid to introduce two different colors for bonds
>because it is not clear to me what kind of impact this would have on
>'set bondmode and/or'
>
>Q: What do you folks think we should do?
>

I have no problem with bonds being limited to a single color for now.  I was 
under the false impression that

color bonds none

did not work, so I could not figure out how to set the bonds back to inheriting 
the atom colors. but again, it was just my lack of understanding exactly *how* 
it works.


many happy returns,

tim
-- 
Timothy Driscoll
molvisions - see, grasp, learn.
<http://www.molvisions.com/>
usa:north carolina:raleigh

"To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve 
Prefontaine


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to