Peter, et al.,
I, too, am very interested in seeing this integration work. I myself
have an immediate need for a good spectroscopy/Jmol connection.
I realize there are several people headed in this direction. My main
point is simply whether it makes sense to have such a large, completely
separate application so closely tied to Jmol. To me it seems that it
deserves its own independent open-source path of development.
Communication and cooperation, of course, is everything. Perhaps what I
am thinking is that with different people developing different
approaches to spectroscopy, the fair thing to do is to establish a
simple set of communication standards - interfaces - that we can
agree on rather than adopt one as THE Jmol spectroscopy interface.
Robert Lancashire can speak for himself, but all indications are that he
is headed for open source within months if not weeks. Robert? Perhaps
you can point us to some of those pages you showed me, just to help
people reading this understand where JmolSpec is at.
-Bob Hanson
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
