[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >De: Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>I think that when "no display" is selected then Jmol should exit in all >>>situations when it has nothing more to do, including when the command >>>line is bogus. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>right, that makes sense. That should be checked -- that there is -n and >>no -s -- and then Jmol should spit out a complaint and exit. >> >> >>There might be other obscure problems as well - What happens when a >>script causes an error and does not finish -- does Jmol quit? >> >> > >IMHO, it should be the same: Jmol quits (eventually with outputing something). >Whenever Jmol has nothing more to do and "no display" is activated, Jmol >should quit. Otherwise, the only way to stop Jmol is to kill it. > > > > oh, yes, absolutely. My question is whether you have tested that?
just committed: "pero" is a joke -- go ahead and change it :) >Nico > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-developers mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
