De: Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>IMHO, it should be the same: Jmol quits (eventually with outputing >>something). Whenever Jmol has nothing more to do and "no display" is >>activated, Jmol should quit. Otherwise, the only way to stop Jmol is to kill >>it. >> >oh, yes, absolutely. My question is whether you have tested that?
No, I didn't have time to do more tests. Will do. >just committed: "pero" is a joke -- go ahead and change it :) :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
