This is definitely not good....Thus I think it is in our best interest  
to begin experimenting with OpenJDK on the Mac.  The biggest problem I  
foresee is that this will kill the usefulness of Jmol in web pages on  
MacOS.  We'll be back to the same problem we had with chime where it  
ran on fewer and fewer platforms.  Of course we can also encourage  
people to switch over to Linux.  Most versions are not quite as glitzy  
as MacOS, but like MacOS they're more stable and more functional than  
Windows.

To some extent I understand the objection to the overhead incurred by  
Java, but for most applications maintaining different code bases for  
different platforms is not necessary to get good performance on a  
modern computer.  I personally hope this ends up hurting Apple.  If  
they don't release the work they've done so far, they really deserve  
to get damaged by this move.

Jonathan
On Oct 22, 2010, at 5:48 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Rzepa, Henry  
> <h.rz...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> http://lists.apple.com/archives/Java-dev/2010/Oct/msg00248.html
>>
>> That expresses future aspirations, rather than testable reality.   
>> There is nothing for
>> OS X  at http://openjdk.java.net/
>
> You can find instructions floating around on the web on how to build
> it... this is one hit:
>
> http://confluence.concord.org/display/CCTR/Build+OpenJDK+Java+1.7.0+on+Mac+OS+X+10.5
>
>> The argument is that implementing  Java for  OS X would almost  
>> certainly require Apple to release source code for the graphical  
>> implementations. If that does not happen, then the actual  
>> experience on the  Mac may become  a poor one.
>
> True. Just like we have seen with the Classpath libraries...
>
> Well, you only payed minimal money for OS/X, so what can you  
> expect? ;)
>
>> Jobs appears to want to take  OS X towards  iOS, which is away from  
>> using a mouse and towards using gestures. I think that adapting   
>> Java for that sort of environment is going to require major work.
>
> Yeah, that is one good reason for Jobs to drop Java... of course, if
> he would have gone Open Source, he could have shared this burden...
>
> Egon
>
> -- 
> Dr E.L. Willighagen
> Postdoctoral Research Associate
> University of Cambridge
> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America  
> contest
> Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and  
> Canada
> $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in  
> marketing
> Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi  
> Store
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-developers mailing list
> Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

                          Dr. Jonathan H. Gutow
Chemistry Department                                 gu...@uwosh.edu
UW-Oshkosh                                           Office:920-424-1326
800 Algoma Boulevard                                 FAX:920-424-2042
Oshkosh, WI 54901
                  http://www.uwosh.edu/facstaff/gutow






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to