On 2005-04-27 (09:10) Philip Bays wrote: >I have a somewhat different experience, I think. Let's try to focus >in on some specific sites to compare. I am using the following: > >http://dev.molvisions.com/debugging/jmolcalls_nocallback.html > >www.saintmarys.edu/~pbays/Stereochemistry/Fischer.htm > >http://jmol.sourceforge.net/demo/atoms/ > >
hi Phil, I think it is a good idea to focus on specific test sites; in addition, the code should be as simple as possible. that way we won't start discussing if callbacks are interfering, whether document.getElementById or document.applets[] are working, etc. I have put together a debugging package. it includes six html files. they differ in whether callbacks are active, and from where they call the JmolApplet (same dir, sub dir, and parent dir). I propose that we copy these files to a few different servers and see how they function on different systems. that way we can control code differences, access differences, and callbacks as variables. if this is acceptable, I have posted a zip of the package here: <http://dev.molvisions.com/debugging/jmolaccess/jmolaccess.zip> if you have a public www server, you can download and unzip the folder, then copy it to your server and email me the url to access it. once we have a few set up, I'll send a list of them to the list and ask for feedback from different systems. I have the package running on my server now: <http://dev.molvisions.com/debugging/jmolaccess/main/> (the index page is inside 'main' so I can include a parent dir above main to hold an applet copy.) what do you think? regards, tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see, grasp, learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> usa:north carolina:raleigh >I find that if I load any one of the three into a fresh Safari, it >works but the subsequent loads do not. > >I am running 10.3.9 with Java 1.42_05_141.4 on two platforms. On >a third, I have the same but I did not apply the most recent 10.3.9 >security and java patches. It exhibits the same issue. So it is >not those updates. On lab machines, we are running 10.3.5 with java >1.4.2_05_141.3. Those machines do not exhibit this issue; all >pagers load fine sequentially. > >On the other hand, Bob looked at 10.3.4 and 10.3.5 machines >yesterday and they had problems, though it was not clear that those >problems were the same as this problem. > >I would like to hear from some others, including Tim, Bill, Bob and >I to see if we can tabulate any sort of OS and Java version >patterns. Can we use these three links as tests? > >Phil > >On Apr 27, 2005, at 8:14 AM, William Reusch wrote: > >>Tim, >> >>I have just examined the following group of pages, loaded in the >>order given.  1. A page from our server, a Silicon Graphics >>platform  2. Your test page  3. A page running on my local Mac  >>4. A different page from our server, using a different >>JmolApplet.jar  5. Phil's Fischer projection page >>(saintmarys.edu/~pbays/Stereochemistry/Fischer.htm)  6. Bob's >>mirror of your test page. The first four run fine, even after >>recycling through all six in random fashion. The last two load but >>do not function. >> >>Bill >> >>timothy driscoll wrote: >>>On 2005-04-26 (16:00) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> >>>>UNFAIR!!! >>>> >>>> >>>>>Bob, Tim , Phil et. al. My finding is similar and yet different. >>>>>I have loaded Tim's original test page, sandwiched between two >>>>>pages of mine which use different copies of JmolApplet.jar files >>>>>on my local Mac, and all pages execute as designed in Safari, >>>>>even reloading in a random fashion. However Bob's two pages, >>>>>which I found to perform properly in two earlier tests fail when >>>>>added to the group. The others continue to function well after >>>>>this addition. Bill >>>>> >>>>> >>>I believe the key here is 'local Mac.' I have found that this >>>problem is restricted to server instances, not local filesystems. >>>so in the first set of three, my test page is the only >>>server-based example and no failure. but in he second set, we >>>have mine plus Bob's pages from different locations, and failure. >>> >>>any takers? ;-) >>> >>> >>>tim >>> >> >> > > >J. Philip Bays Department of Chemistry and Physics Saint Mary's >College Notre Dame IN 46556 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
