De: Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I raised this once before, and I may be out of date, but I'd like to >raise it again. It seems necessasry to use relative addresses for >jmol.js and the jmol directory in web pages. I can the see the principle i >here but it causes serious problems in two respects:- > >1. When trying to incorporate jmol in wiki pages. One user doing this >reports that ../extensions/jmol is needed for it to work in preview and >./extensions/jmol when the article is saved (I could have these the >wrong way round). An absolute address would fix this. I can not even get >it to work like that user reports. I'm still struggling.
I will work again on Jmol extension for MediaWiki in April, after the Jmol wiki is moved to MediaWiki. If you can wait until then, I will see what can be done to install easily the Jmol extension. Otherwise, you can easily modify Jmol.js to remove the test on absolute addresses. Miguel: would it be ok to add a function like jmolAuthorizeAbsoluteAddress() in Jmol.js so that people can desactivate the test on absolute addresses ? Nico ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
