> Bob, > > Good point. I thought that was just the data that I got from PubChem that > only gave 2D structure but I will have another look at it. > > Alex > > On 3/24/06, Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> yes, well..., ah,... couldn't you get 3D structures, not 2D? >> I would be afraid people would get the impression these molecules are >> flat.... you do say "Three-Dimensional"....
Several educators have told me that it is a mistake for Jmol to read 2D structures ... because of the potential confusion caused by representing these structures as flat. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
