Jan wrote:
>> Please send me a script example.
>>
> load a_protein
> restrict 1
> hbonds on
> connect hbond (1.O) (1.N)
> # invisible
> hbonds on
> # visible
> connect delete (1.O) (1.N)
> hbonds on
> connect hbond (1.O) (1.N)
> # invisible
> connect delete (1.O) (1.N)
> connect single (1.O) (1.N)
> connect hbond (1.O) (1.N)
> # *visible* hbond

very good script.

> my opinion is, this is OK, hbonds should be created visible, as are
> single or double bonds.

I agree.

There is some subtle interaction with some of the old rasmol-compatibility
hbond code.

I will investigate.

This is a broader question but ...

Q: Is there ever a reason why someone would want hbonds turned off?

Q: Why should hbonds ever be treated differently from normal bonds?

Q: If you read in a file that contains hbonds, do you want them displayed
by default?


>> Q: Please confirm that you are using the 10.00.51 release and tell me if
>> you are still having problems with 'backbone 1'
>>
>>
> it is fixed, my message and your fix overlap, now, with
> the Jmol Version 10.00.51  2006-03-30 06:27 I have no
> problems with backbone 1

Good.


Miguel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to