> Bob, > > I had the same problem when updating Jmol website. > What about renaming the jars as : > - JmolApplet_XXX.jar for the unsigned applet (what about > JmolApplet0.jar ? keep it or JmolApplet_0.jar) > - JmolAppletSigned_XXX.jar for the signed applet (what about > JmolAppletSigned0.jar ?) > The difference is in the '_' that should keep all files for the Signed > applet together, and all files for the unsigned applet together. > > Nico > I agree completely. We need something. I like the idea of the underscore. Generally you either want the signed or unsigned applet, not both. So it would be convenient to use
JmolApplet_*.jar JmolAppletSigned_*.jar to refer to those. HOWEVER, the catch is that we really should stick with JmolApplet0.jar and JmolAppletSigned0.jar, because those are what are referred to in Jmol.js. Short of requiring a new Jmol.js, it would be nice to not have to worry about that. How about this: JmolApplet.jar JmolApplet0.jar JmolApplet0_Main.jar JmolApplet0_Core.jar etc. and JmolAppletSigned.jar JmolAppletSigned0.jar JmolAppletSigned0_Main.jar JmolAppletSigned0_Core.jar Without the 0 is all of Jmol; with the 0 means "0.jar and its associated files". I know the "0" looks a bit strange, but then we have the easy task of selecting JmolApplet0*.jar or JmolAppletSigned0*.jar and getting all the files one needs. And it perhaps makes it clearer that you MUST have *0.jar to utilize any of the others. That they are all one set. This was obvious with 0-6.jar, and this might be a nice compromise to make it sensible again. Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
