Bob - The full email re the following message bounced because of size.
I'll send the entire email off list.
Bob,
In my second note, I was only referring to the extracted file approach.
With state saving, I still have the bond issue. I should mention that
I'm using the following to "restore:"
jmolScript("script ../temp/" + "555556565656" + ".txt")
The basic idea is that two users "checks out" a modelkit identified by a
unique 12 digit number. Changes to this model are recorded in a server
text file, and the remote users see these changes via the shared number
and the above script. The state file below (end of email) should be
2-butyne that started from an ethene molfile load. The model kit edit
shows 2-butyne, but here is what the above script produces from the
state file:
Otis Rothenberger
chemagic.com
On 9/25/2010 8:46 AM, Otis Rothenberger wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I stand corrected. I do not lose rotation affects by using the
> extracted molfiles. So the only issue for our application is partial
> charges on files that contain this information.
>
> Exchange of models originating from NIH are also a problem. Although
> the state file has the inline load data, I assume this problem is
> related to the fact that the NIH model url has only a temporary
> existence.
>
> I'm thinking extracted molfiles are my best bet at this point.
>
> Otis
>
>
> Otis Rothenberger
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
