Hi Andrea > Yes, I went quite mad to arrange the columns in the correct format.
Well, column positions in your example do NOT match what I take for the correct format, as exemplified in http://jmol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jmol/trunk/Jmol-datafiles/pqr/1 FAS.pqr I had to shift your Q and R data by 1-2 columns to get them right. I am not sure if that was what solved the problem (I made several attempts), but you should do it anyway. > Yes, but the radii are scaled down... Yes. With the original radii I could only see 2 atoms out of the 5, at spacefill 100%. It seems that, like you suggest, there is a limit to the size of atoms in Jmol rendering. I suggest that you reduce both the radii and the coordinates by the same factor (1/10). That may be the clue for efficient interpretation and display. > However the problem is not in loading the file. File is loaded and spheres > are displayed in the correct positions, Well, the coordinates will beb read correctly, but the radii may not if they are not in the right columns. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
