bart zagers wrote: > Hey, > > I have to agree, we have introduced similar methods ourselves, > although we call them isNotBefore and isNotAfter. In fact, we use them > more often than isBefore and isAfter.
I have long debated the possible usefulness of these methods. Are there any other supporters of them? Stephen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Joda-interest mailing list Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
