I agree with Paul. The only reason to add the methods is to increase readability.

Paul Field wrote:
I'm for having the methods, although I prefer the "isOnOrAfter/isOnOrBefore"
naming.

For me, the reason for having the extra methods is for readability;
'!a.isAfter(b)' is logically equivalent to 'a.isOnOrBefore(b)' but they read
differently and so can make code easier to understand. If the naming of the
method is "isNotAfter" then I don't see the advantage over using the existing
method with the not operator (!a.isAfter(b)).

Paul
------------------
Paul Field
Research IT
Deutsche Bank


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/01/2008 17:01:07:

  
Count me as one, and FWIW I like 'isNotBefore' and 'isNotAfter' as
method names.

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
Stephen Colebourne
Sent: Tue 1/1/2008 3:25 AM
To: Discussion of the Joda project
Subject: Re: [Joda-interest] New methods in LocalDate and LocalTime classes

bart zagers wrote:
    
Hey,

I have to agree, we have introduced similar methods ourselves,
although we call them isNotBefore and isNotAfter. In fact, we use them
more often than isBefore and isAfter.
      
I have long debated the possible usefulness of these methods. Are there
any other supporters of them?

Stephen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
    

---

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized
copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly
forbidden.

Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional
EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest

  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest

Reply via email to