Count me as one, and FWIW I like 'isNotBefore' and 'isNotAfter' as method names.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stephen Colebourne
Sent: Tue 1/1/2008 3:25 AM
To: Discussion of the Joda project
Subject: Re: [Joda-interest] New methods in LocalDate and LocalTime classes
bart zagers wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have to agree, we have introduced similar methods ourselves,
> although we call them isNotBefore and isNotAfter. In fact, we use them
> more often than isBefore and isAfter.
I have long debated the possible usefulness of these methods. Are there
any other supporters of them?
Stephen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Joda-interest mailing list
Joda-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joda-interest
