> What's the point of trying to shame Laurent?
i thought his use of this tragedy to further his points was shameful. as did
others, not just me.
> You expressed your opinion but
> you didn't pursuade anyone.
I would suggest otherwise. several people were in agreement. In fact, why single
me out Jim? Still think I am fascist? Still sore?
>
>
> You are just blaming the messenger. I would say that the terrorism is
> "disgusting, outrageous, cruel and mean spirited" as you put it. Laurent
> didn't even do any name-calling. (Although YOU did.)
Ignorance of language. Where is the name calling? I told him what i thought of
his tactic. I didn't call him any names.
before you write posts like this, think. There were certain posts of yours,
where you certainly and boldly name called, not just in the sevral mails but in
the titles too. Or is your memory that short?
