Good point Kakki, but what's their excuse for the fact that those very
fashions have re-surfaced and are flooding the clothing market even as we
speak! And if anyone watches very much TV, especially cable/satellite, they
would probably agree that it would appear that the creators of some of these
shows are indeed stoned...I could go so far as to say that it's possible
that the "War on Drugs" is a ploy by the television industry to throw the
straight people off track of what's really going on over there.
OK I'm done.
Donna
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kakki
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wild Things Run Fast (md-2)
Marcel wrote:
> My bet is that Toto bought the blow. Which explains everything from the
"disjointedness" of the record to the sounds.
Well, I wasn't going to say it - but now that you've brought it up - the
first thing I thought on pondering the earlier posts was that perhaps it was
WTRF that she was referring to in her drugs quote in LA Weekly this week ;-D
I made it through the past several decades without personally partaking of
any substance but vividly remember the enormous and excessive amounts
(literally a sackful at one) of the stuff at parties and even in clubs in
the mid '70s to early '80s. I remember reading an article once where some
people were reflecting that the reason some of the '70s movies, TV and
fashions were so bad/hideous/mediocre was because everyone was so strung out
there for awhile and thought everything they created was just wonderful.
Not trying to debate drugs, etc., but I thought the article was somewhat
correct!
Kakki
