Hi Witold 2013/10/23 Witold Szczerba <[email protected]>
> Hi Lukas, > I think Darren is right and you are underestimating, so called, > 'casual' users. JOOQ gives power users features they can get nowhere > else. > > The fact is, most casual database users are struggling with JPA or > Hibernate. In fact, I guess, they would save themselves a pain if they > would switch to document repositories, because most of the time they > do CRUD of tree-like forms, mapped to relational table model. Maybe > few percent of their data is truly "relational". > > So, they don't want or they cannot switch to NoSQL (like I said, most > of the time they cannot even switch from Oracle/MsSQL to PostgreSQL), > so basic JOOQ usage like code generator and basic CRUD is all they can > hope for. > Hehe, funny how a code generator and basic CRUD is what Hibernate had been offering all along, and apparently, people are struggling with it...? But clearly, not everyone agrees on that. Many people love Hibernate, and I wish people wouldn't try to look for a "better Hibernate" in jOOQ. jOOQ's mission statement compared to Hibernate is very clear: http://www.hibernate-alternative.com Hibernate was awesome from the beginning. But people expected it to be a magic bullet for all sorts of problems and didn't get what they wanted... > JOOQ works great, simple stuff is simple, so there is no need for them > to ask questions or have their say. I think there can be more of them > than you think... > > As usual, taking advantage of the opportunity, thanks for great job! > If only the JCP Spec Leaders were capable of creating such a stuff, > the world would be a much better place to live, hehehe > Eh, I don't do politics (yet). ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
