Just to avoid confusion, could you or Karen please resend the poll question
with the correct room count?
Thanks,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Schaad [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:08 AM
To: Mike Jones; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
I believe that I switched the question between the room and here. The question
in the room was should we switch FROM SHA1 to something else.
The room count should be reversed with the revised question.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:53 AM
> To: Jim Schaad; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> I believe that the results below are recorded incorrectly. I know
> that I personally voted that we use the default parameters as widely
> deployed (SHA-1), so the results below can not be right. I believe
> that the
results were
> likely actually:
>
> Room vote: 5 yes, 0 no, 3 discuss
>
> -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Jim Schaad
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [jose] POLL: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> <CHAIR>
>
> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want
> to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.
>
> Should SHA1 be the default parameters for these algorithms?
>
>
> Room vote: 0 yes, 5 no, 3 discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
