Karen or Jim, would you mind resending this poll question in a way that the
question and the room count match? I agree with Brian that the current
situation is incredibly confusing and I believe that the confusion is
interfering with us getting unambiguous results for this question.
When you resend it, could you maybe also give people who've already replied an
opportunity to reconfirm their positions? It wouldn't surprise me if some of
the votes changed once the ambiguity is cleared up.
Thanks a bunch,
-- Mike
From: Brian Campbell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:30 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Jim Schaad; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
I, for one, am very confused by this one. I just went with the intention to
vote in favor of using widely deployed default parameters (like SHA1) but after
reading this and the poll thread again, I wasn't sure what a yes or no vote was
actually for.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mike Jones
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Just to avoid confusion, could you or Karen please resend the poll question
with the correct room count?
Thanks,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Schaad [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:08 AM
To: Mike Jones; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
I believe that I switched the question between the room and here. The question
in the room was should we switch FROM SHA1 to something else.
The room count should be reversed with the revised question.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Jones
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:53 AM
> To: Jim Schaad; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> I believe that the results below are recorded incorrectly. I know
> that I personally voted that we use the default parameters as widely
> deployed (SHA-1), so the results below can not be right. I believe
> that the
results were
> likely actually:
>
> Room vote: 5 yes, 0 no, 3 discuss
>
> -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf
> Of Jim Schaad
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [jose] POLL: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> <CHAIR>
>
> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want
> to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.
>
> Should SHA1 be the default parameters for these algorithms?
>
>
> Room vote: 0 yes, 5 no, 3 discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
