I, for one, am very confused by this one. I just went with the intention to
vote in favor of using widely deployed default parameters (like SHA1) but
after reading this and the poll thread again, I wasn't sure what a yes or
no vote was actually for.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]>wrote:

> Just to avoid confusion, could you or Karen please resend the poll
> question with the correct room count?
>
>                                 Thanks,
>                                 -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Schaad [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 4:08 AM
> To: Mike Jones; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
>
> I believe that I switched the question between the room and here.  The
> question in the room was should we switch FROM SHA1 to something else.
>
> The room count should be reversed with the revised question.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:53 AM
> > To: Jim Schaad; [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [jose] DISCUSS: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
> >
> > I believe that the results below are recorded incorrectly.  I know
> > that I personally voted that we use the default parameters as widely
> > deployed (SHA-1), so the results below can not be right.  I believe
> > that the
> results were
> > likely actually:
> >
> > Room vote:  5 yes, 0 no, 3 discuss
> >
> >                               -- Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> > Of Jim Schaad
> > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [jose] POLL: RSA-OAEP/RSA-PSS default parameters
> >
> > <CHAIR>
> >
> > If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again.  If you want
> > to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.
> >
> > Should SHA1 be the default parameters for these algorithms?
> >
> >
> > Room vote:  0 yes, 5 no, 3 discuss
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jose mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to