1 I think this needs more work and time before trying to move it into the base spec.
On 2013-04-11, at 8:58 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes adding an > “spi” (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and JWE > specifications. This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for > signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used, rather > than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header. This proposal has > been written up as http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00. > > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? > > 1. Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could > optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations. > > 2. Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications as > a mandatory feature. > > 3. Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications as > an optional feature. > > 4. Another resolution (please specify in detail). > > 0. I need more information to decide. > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
