Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?

[Javier Rojas Blum]

1 On 04/17/2013 08:41 AM, charles.mar...@orange.com wrote: Hi, 1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations. Br, Charles Marais. Le 12/04/2013 01:58, Karen O'Donoghue a écrit : Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes adding an “spi” (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and JWE specifications.  This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used, rather than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header.  This proposal has been written up as http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00.   Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? 1.  Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations. 2.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications as a mandatory feature. 3.  Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications as an optional feature. 4.  Another resolution (please specify in detail). 0.  I need more information to decide. Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose -- MARAIS Charles FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED Tel : 02.96.05.24.18 charles.mar...@orange.com WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex - France _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose