Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,

[Javier Rojas Blum]

2 But keeping the "kid" header param On 04/17/2013 08:40 AM, charles.mar...@orange.com wrote: Hi, 1. Retain the “x5c” header parameter in JWE. Br, Charles Marais. Le 12/04/2013 01:59, Karen O'Donoghue a écrit : Issue #12 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12 suggests removing the “x5c” header parameter from JWE, saying that no use case for it has emerged.  The same logic may apply to other key specification parameters for JWE. Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? 1.  Retain the “x5c” header parameter in JWE. 2.  Remove the “x5c” header parameter (and possibly other related key specification parameters) from JWE. 3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail). 0.  I need more information to decide.   Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose -- MARAIS Charles FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED Tel : 02.96.05.24.18 charles.mar...@orange.com WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex - France _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose