Count me as "don't really care", modulo ISSUE-15.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>wrote: > Issue #12 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12 suggests > removing the “x5c” header parameter from JWE, saying that no use case for > it has emerged. The same logic may apply to other key specification > parameters for JWE.**** > > ** > ** > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?**** > > 1. Retain the “x5c” header parameter in JWE.**** > > 2. Remove the “x5c” header parameter (and possibly other related key > specification parameters) from JWE.**** > > 3. Another resolution (please specify in detail).**** > > 0. I need more information to decide.**** > > ** ** > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
