1 12 apr 2013 kl. 01:59 skrev Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>:
> Issue #12 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12 suggests removing > the “x5c” header parameter from JWE, saying that no use case for it has > emerged. The same logic may apply to other key specification parameters for > JWE. > > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? > > 1. Retain the “x5c” header parameter in JWE. > > 2. Remove the “x5c” header parameter (and possibly other related key > specification parameters) from JWE. > > 3. Another resolution (please specify in detail). > > 0. I need more information to decide. > > > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
