+1 2013/4/12 <[email protected]>: > 1 > > > > x5c is the most explicit way to describe which private key is the right one. > It is an alternative to kid which is another reason why kid must not be > mandatory. > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Karen O'Donoghue > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c > field be removed from JWE?, , > > > > Issue #12 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/12 suggests > removing the “x5c” header parameter from JWE, saying that no use case for it > has emerged. The same logic may apply to other key specification parameters > for JWE. > > > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? > > 1. Retain the “x5c” header parameter in JWE. > > 2. Remove the “x5c” header parameter (and possibly other related key > specification parameters) from JWE. > > 3. Another resolution (please specify in detail). > > 0. I need more information to decide. > > > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
-- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Chairman, OpenID Foundation http://nat.sakimura.org/ @_nat_en _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
