On 2015-07-01 17:37, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
Folks,
With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have
> two remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options
> include: 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of
> individual drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please
> express your thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen,
> and I would like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please
respond by 15 July.
Dear Karen,
I have seen considerable interest in groups like ACME and W3C Web Payments for
JSON-based signature schemes that does not require Base64-encoded payloads like:
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt
Therefore I support progression of this I-D.
Sincerely,
Anders Rundgren
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt
Thanks,
Karen
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
