On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote:
> Folks, > > With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two > remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include: > 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual > drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your > thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would > like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15 > July. > > > https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt > > > https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt > I would very much like us to avoid the need to base64 encode payloads in protocols like ACME. HTTP is 8 bit clean by design and thus no need to base 64. So I support draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00 going forward on standards track.
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
