Oops - adding the link to issue #26:  
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/26.

From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:16 AM
To: Karen O'Donoghue; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts

About 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00, I'll 
add that this addresses the requests make by Jim Schaad and Richard Barnes in 
JOSE Issues #26 "Allow for signature payload to not be base64 encoded" and #23 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/23 "Make crypto independent of 
binary encoding (base64)".

About 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01, 
I'll add that this addresses the request made by Jim Schaad in JOSE Issue #2 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/2 "No key management for MAC".

Also, there's a highly relevant discussion about key management for MACs going 
on in the COSE working group.  See the thread "[Cose] Key management for MACs 
(was Re: Review of draft-schaad-cose-msg-01)" - especially 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/aUehU6O7Ui8CXcGxy3TquZOxWH4 and 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ouOIdAOe2P-W8BjGLJ7BNvvRr10.

One could take the view that our decision on the JOSE key management draft 
should be informed by the related decision in COSE.  Specifically, that if COSE 
decides to support key management for MACs, the same reasoning likely should 
apply to our decision on whether to define a standard mechanism for supporting 
key management for MACs in JOSE.

                                                            -- Mike

From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:38 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts

Folks,

With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two 
remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include: 1) 
adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual drafts; 
or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your thoughts on 
what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would like to make a 
decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15 July.

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt

Thanks,
Karen
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to