Hi, I'm sending draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options draft to the W3C Web Payments Interest Group for reviews, as some participants there have expressed interest in a more developer-readable method for signed linked data.
--Wendy On 07/13/2015 02:24 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > Hello, > > It's good too see that a few people do support these drafts. Will each of > you be sending reviews and comments to the list shortly on these drafts? If > the chairs think it's reasonable to accept the drafts, they will also need to > know there will be active support. > > Thanks, > Kathleen > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 13, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Edmund Jay <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> >> From: Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> >> To: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]> >> Cc: Mike Jones <[email protected]>; Karen O'Donoghue >> <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:32 AM >> Subject: Re: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts >> >> Sorry to chime in so late. I have been completely under water for sometime >> now. >> >> Like Phil, I do see that draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options sort of >> thing can be very useful, though I may want to have slightly different way >> of encoding the things. Being able to do detached signature is quite >> attractive. >> >> Best, >> >> Nat >> >> 2015-07-10 2:37 GMT+09:00 Kathleen Moriarty >> <[email protected]>: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> About >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00, >>> I’ll add that this addresses the requests make by Jim Schaad and Richard >>> Barnes in JOSE Issues #26 “Allow for signature payload to not be base64 >>> encoded” and #23 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/23 “Make >>> crypto independent of binary encoding (base64)”. >>> >>> About >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01, >>> I’ll add that this addresses the request made by Jim Schaad in JOSE Issue >>> #2 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/2 “No key management for >>> MAC”. >>> >>> Also, there’s a highly relevant discussion about key management for MACs >>> going on in the COSE working group. See the thread “[Cose] Key management >>> for MACs (was Re: Review of draft-schaad-cose-msg-01)” – especially >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/aUehU6O7Ui8CXcGxy3TquZOxWH4 and >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ouOIdAOe2P-W8BjGLJ7BNvvRr10. >>> >>> One could take the view that our decision on the JOSE key management draft >>> should be informed by the related decision in COSE. Specifically, that if >>> COSE decides to support key management for MACs, the same reasoning likely >>> should apply to our decision on whether to define a standard mechanism for >>> supporting key management for MACs in JOSE. >> Key management is explicitly out-of-scope for COSE as stated in the charter. >> The discussion referenced had this point at the close of that discussion. >> >> I'm not seeing much support for these drafts moving forward in JOSE. I'm >> also not seeing enough to justify standards track and AD sponsored. If you >> think these are important to have move forward in the WG or as standards >> track, please say so soon. They can still go forward through the >> Independent submission process through the ISE. >> >> Thank you, >> Kathleen >> >>> -- Mike >>> >>> From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:38 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [jose] way forward for two remaining drafts >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two >>> remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include: >>> 1) adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual >>> drafts; or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your >>> thoughts on what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would >>> like to make a decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15 >>> July. >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Karen _____________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > -- Wendy Seltzer -- [email protected] +1.617.715.4883 (office) Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile) _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
