Based on the feedback from the working group, the chairs are making the 
following consensus calls:

There is no jose wg consensus to adopt the following document:
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt

However, there is consensus to adopt the following document:
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt

We would like to complete this document in the next two months so please read 
and provide substantive comments as soon as possible.

Regards,
Karen and Jim


On Jul 1, 2015, at 5:37 PM, Karen O'Donoghue 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Folks,

With the thumbprint draft progressing through the process, we have two 
remaining individual drafts to decide what to do with. The options include: 1) 
adopt as working group drafts; 2) ask for AD sponsorship of individual drafts; 
or 3) recommend that they not be published. Please express your thoughts on 
what we should do with these drafts. Jim, Kathleen, and I would like to make a 
decision in the Prague timeframe, so please respond by 15 July.

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00.txt

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-jose-key-managed-json-web-signature-01.txt

Thanks,
Karen
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to