Great! The "k" parameter appears to be mandatory for "oct" JWKs. How can we reconcile that with the p11 spec? Ideas?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7518#section-6.4.1 On 05/07/17 21:01, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > I have updated the draft from the comments everyone has provided. > However, document uploads are currently locked due to the IETF > meeting, so I have attached the document here. Your feedback is > greatly appreciated. > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Nathaniel McCallum > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have prepared an initial stab at a draft for offloading JWK private >> key data to PKCS #11. >> >> You can find the document here: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mccallum-jose-pkcs11-jwk-00.txt >> _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
