On 2017-07-06 23:07, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote:
Great!
The "k" parameter appears to be mandatory for "oct" JWKs. How can we
reconcile that with the p11 spec? Ideas?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7518#section-6.4.1
It gets even more fun with OKP JWKs:
https://github.com/cyberphone/java-cfrg-spec
Anders
On 05/07/17 21:01, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
I have updated the draft from the comments everyone has provided.
However, document uploads are currently locked due to the IETF
meeting, so I have attached the document here. Your feedback is
greatly appreciated.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
<[email protected]> wrote:
I have prepared an initial stab at a draft for offloading JWK private
key data to PKCS #11.
You can find the document here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mccallum-jose-pkcs11-jwk-00.txt
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
