Yes. Thank you for correcting my oversight! On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding section 4 of the proposed -01 spec: > > When dealing with "oct" JWKs, shouldn't the PKCS#11 URI type parameter > become "secret-key"? > > Vladimir > > > On 05/07/17 21:01, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: >> I have updated the draft from the comments everyone has provided. >> However, document uploads are currently locked due to the IETF >> meeting, so I have attached the document here. Your feedback is >> greatly appreciated. >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Nathaniel McCallum >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I have prepared an initial stab at a draft for offloading JWK private >>> key data to PKCS #11. >>> >>> You can find the document here: >>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mccallum-jose-pkcs11-jwk-00.txt >>> >>> Thanks for your consideration! > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
