+1

The normative version is text.

One day this will be fixed for new RFC but not for existing ones.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 4:23 PM Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a tooling issue and not an issue of the document itself.
>
> Jim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 1:10 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7515 (6118)
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7515, "JSON Web
> Signature (JWS)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6118
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Jason Heiss <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> (as permitted by Section 3.2)
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> This appears to be a reference to section 3.2 of RFC 4648, but because it
> is somewhat ambiguous the HTML and PDF versions of the RFC link to section
> 3.2 of this RFC instead.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status
> and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7515 (draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-41)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : JSON Web Signature (JWS)
> Publication Date    : May 2015
> Author(s)           : M. Jones, J. Bradley, N. Sakimura
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Javascript Object Signing and Encryption
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to