On 04.05.2020 17:19, Robert Sparks wrote:
Hi Carsten -
How is the SMOP you are envisioning different from the inline-errata
tooling?
See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc6016.html or
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc8400.html for small
examples.
...
The inline errata tooling can only help if something is an actual
erratum (some kind of a bug in the published RFC).
The thing discussed above refers to a bug introduced by the "rfcmarkup"
tool, which transforms the plain text version into HTML, and
occasionally messes up section links.
FWIW, I agree with Carsten that some kind of exception list would help
in that at least we wouldn't get the same errata reports all over again.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
