[On the usual problem with htmlizing links to other RFCs:] On 2020-05-04, at 02:30, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote: > One day this will be fixed for new RFC but not for existing ones.
Why not? It would be a SMOP(*) to invest the htmlizer with knowledge about misdirected links that were discovered in existing RFCs. Each of these errata reports (and all the existing rejected ones) would inform this. Grüße, Carsten (*) SMOP: Small matter of programming. Usually said by people who don’t want to do the work themselves. _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
