On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:46:13PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > My personal favourite is this one: > > http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/244 > > Since the current system violates the principle of least surprise for > > me. It's been there a while though, so the patch has probably > > bitrotted :( > > Seems I had completely overlooked this when you posted it. Must work > on my trac discipline ;-) I see that Gabriel has implemented some > things in the mean time (user:... is now suppoerted) but not others > that were in your patch. I'll investigate.
Actually all of that is implemented now, except the OR precedence bit: a b OR c d is currently parsed as "a (b OR c) d". Should that better be "(a b) OR (c d)"? What do you think? Gabriel. _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/josm-dev
