Nic Roets napsal(a): > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But with JOSM-NG sitting around untouched by anyone but Petr himself, >> and this for the best part of a year, the argument that a properly >> designed JOSM would attract more programmers rings hollow. What JOSM >> currently needs most is a few people who share the responsibility, who >> make JOSM "their" project and who are willing to do more than submit the >> occasional patch. It seems to me that JOSM-NG, despite its clean >> architecture and technical superiority which I don't doubt for a second, >> has not managed to find these people either. > > A few hints to finding these people : > * Don't call it JOSM-NG. JOSM already has a bad name.
This is the second time I hear this. > * Get people to use it before you invite them to write plugins. That > means limit the scope of the project, but make sure it all actually > works (incl. uploads). Yes, that's high on my priority list, but I can't help myself from time to time and let myself get distracted bu something less important. And I am also a mapper myself, so whenever I return from a new destination, I rather map than code ;-) > Is it true that JOSM-NG will have a different upload process ? Not at > the end, but while the user was editing ?? If so, I would not consider No. And it wouldn't make much sense under 0.6 OSM API.... > it superior because of the added complexity. ... but why do you think it would add complexity, and why would you judge superiority based on complexity? -- Petr "Nenik" Nejedly, NetBeans/Sun Microsystems, http://www.netbeans.org 355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation! _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
