2010/2/16 Matthias Julius <[email protected]>: > Karl Guggisberg <[email protected]> writes: > >> Based on a thread on this list I've written down a proposal for a future >> Build and Release Number scheme, see >> http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/DevelopersGuide/ReleaseNumbers. I've >> tried to summarize the discussion in the thread but the final proposal >> is obviously biased toward what I like most. Please post to this list if >> you have any objections or leave a note on the wiki. If this proposal >> was to be followed the next release would be named *JOSM 10.1*. > > As I wrote in the other thread I am not in favor of year based version > numbers except for software that follows a strict yearly release > schedule or where the year is somehow relevant (like tax software). > > For all others I prefer feature based version numbers where a change > in the major part indicates substantial and potentially disruptive > changes like a new API version or a completely new UI or so. Or, > maybe a switch from Java to Perl. ;-) +1
_______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
