-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 André Riedel schrieb: > 2010/2/16 Matthias Julius <[email protected]>: >> Karl Guggisberg <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Based on a thread on this list I've written down a proposal for a future >>> Build and Release Number scheme, see >>> http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/DevelopersGuide/ReleaseNumbers. I've >>> tried to summarize the discussion in the thread but the final proposal >>> is obviously biased toward what I like most. Please post to this list if >>> you have any objections or leave a note on the wiki. If this proposal >>> was to be followed the next release would be named *JOSM 10.1*. >> As I wrote in the other thread I am not in favor of year based version >> numbers except for software that follows a strict yearly release >> schedule or where the year is somehow relevant (like tax software). >> >> For all others I prefer feature based version numbers where a change >> in the major part indicates substantial and potentially disruptive >> changes like a new API version or a completely new UI or so. Or, >> maybe a switch from Java to Perl. ;-) > +1 +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREIAAYFAkt8DH4ACgkQalWTFLzqsCvE+ACfRJucRTabW3s75BxLs122WhkA k84AnixxGIeTEixraqI627XjNcYbm4+U =HYnw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
