Hi, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Maybe. I'm not familiar with it. But it does seem to do a lot of > things right, and it's well maintained and complete. You could do a > lot worse than using its primatives and well tested upload/download > code for a new client.
I am not convinced that any branch aimed at making JOSM more suitable for gwt will still be well maintained and complete ;-) or more precisely, I am pretty sure that it will not be possible to pull this off without drawbacks for the "real" JOSM. > Isn't josm-ng dead-ish at this point? I thought it was just a one-man > project whose ideas are mostly in the main josm by now, maybe I'm > wrong. If you want a Java library to handle OSM primitives, you can do worse than using JOSM-NG, dead or not dead. And if you want a Java library with a bunch of active developers behind it then I suspect that you are unlikely to find that in JOSM. > Anyway, we'll see how this GWT experiment turns out. True. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
