On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > Dirk, > > Dirk Stöcker wrote: >> I'm not so sure this is true anymore. JOSM's internal structure has been >> reworked largely and it has a big advantage - it has been tested for a >> long time and works reliable. > > Nothing against JOSM's internal structure but it seemed to me that Avar > was looking for a rather general OSM library, whereas even today, and > even if you look at the base layer of objects in JOSM, everything is > geared towards being an editor - you'll find projected coordinates in > the node objects, your primitives will have flags saying whether they > are editable or not, and so on. All this is perfectly OK in the JOSM > context but I wouldn't want that overhead for general OSM data processing.
The lib is also geared to be and editor. the goal is to make a webbased thin client for josm. mike _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
