Dirk, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > I'm not so sure this is true anymore. JOSM's internal structure has been > reworked largely and it has a big advantage - it has been tested for a > long time and works reliable.
Nothing against JOSM's internal structure but it seemed to me that Avar was looking for a rather general OSM library, whereas even today, and even if you look at the base layer of objects in JOSM, everything is geared towards being an editor - you'll find projected coordinates in the node objects, your primitives will have flags saying whether they are editable or not, and so on. All this is perfectly OK in the JOSM context but I wouldn't want that overhead for general OSM data processing. Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
