Firefox isn't even in jQuery.browser, so unlikely Chrome will be. If Chrome is added, Firefox should be too. Although Safari is in it instead of WebKit (not sure why that is, especially since the version does not match the browser).
--Sam 2008/9/16 jonhobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I wish this is true but unfortunately it doesn't seem to be. > > <select> lists look completely different for example. > > Jon > > On Sep 4, 1:29 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't see a reason to add it. Really should be treated any differently > than > > any other WebKit engine is (unfortunately named 'safari' in .browsers). > > > > --John > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Erik Beeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Chrome on Vista is reporting: > > > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 > (KHTML, > > > like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 > > > > > Will this be added to jQuery.browser? > > > > > --Erik > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
